0 692

Cited 41 times in

Lower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system: a split-face, evaluator-blinded study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author방동식-
dc.contributor.author이주희-
dc.contributor.author정진영-
dc.contributor.author조성빈-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T17:29:16Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-23T17:29:16Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1076-0512-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/102558-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Adequate laser settings in the treatment of scars using a carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO(2) FS) have not been established. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence, high-density with high-fluence, low-density treatment with CO(2) FS on acne scars and enlarged pores. METHODS: Ten patients with mild to severe atrophic acne scars and enlarged pores were enrolled. Half of each subject's face was treated with a single session of CO(2) FS with a fluence of 70 mJ and a density of 150 spots/cm(2) ; the other half was treated with a fluence of 30 mJ and a density of 250 spots/cm(2) . RESULTS: Follow-up results 3 months after a single low-fluence, high-density treatment with CO(2) FS showed that four of 10 participants had clinical improvement of 51% to 75% from baseline. After the high-fluence, low-density CO(2) FS treatment, five of 10 patients demonstrated marked clinical improvements of more than 76%. CONCLUSION: Higher-energy, lower-density laser settings seem to be more effective than lower-energy, higher-density settings for acne scars and enlarged pores, although our results do not constitute a conclusive comparison of the two different modes of CO(2) FS-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent2022~2029-
dc.relation.isPartOfDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAcne Vulgaris/radiotherapy*-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHCarbon Dioxide-
dc.subject.MESHCicatrix/radiotherapy*-
dc.subject.MESHFace-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLow-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHLow-Level Light Therapy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHStatistics, Nonparametric-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleLower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system: a split-face, evaluator-blinded study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Dermatology (피부과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJIN YOUNG JUNG-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJU HEE LEE-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDONG JIN RYU-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSANG JU LEE-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDONGSIK BANG-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSUNG BIN CHO-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01803.x-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01784-
dc.contributor.localIdA03832-
dc.contributor.localIdA03171-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00707-
dc.identifier.eissn1524-4725-
dc.identifier.pmid21070459-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01803.x/abstract-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameBang, Dong Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Ju Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Sung Bin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBang, Dong Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Sung Bin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Ju Hee-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage2022-
dc.citation.endPage2029-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, Vol.36(12) : 2022-2029, 2010-
dc.identifier.rimsid49831-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Dermatology (피부과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.