0 427

Cited 63 times in

Analysis of overall survival from a phase III study of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author정현철-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T16:53:00Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-23T16:53:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0167-6806-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/101408-
dc.description.abstractLimited proven treatment options exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to anthracycline and taxane treatment. Ixabepilone, a novel semisynthetic analog of epothilone B, has demonstrated single-agent activity in MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes. In combination with capecitabine in a phase III trial (CA163-046) in this setting, ixabepilone prolonged progression-free survival and increased objective response rate relative to capecitabine (Thomas et al. J Clin Oncol 25:5210-5217, 2007). Here, we report the results of overall survival (OS), a secondary efficacy endpoint from the CA163-046 trial. Seven hundred fifty-two patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes were randomized to ixabepilone (40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or capecitabine alone (2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule). Patients receiving ixabepilone plus capecitabine treatment had a median survival of 12.9 months compared to 11.1 months for patients receiving capecitabine alone (HR = 0.9; 95%CI: 077-1.05; P = 0.19). This observed increase in median OS favored the combination; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Predefined subset analyses showed a clinically meaningful increase in OS in KPS 70-80 patients receiving ixabepilone plus capecitabine (HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.98). Ixabepilone plus capecitabine did not show a significant improvement in survival compared to capecitabine alone in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes. The observed differences in survival favored the combination arm. A clinical benefit was also seen in patients in the KPS 70-80 subgroup-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent409~418-
dc.relation.isPartOfBREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAnthracyclines/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAntibiotics, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAntimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAsia-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/secondary-
dc.subject.MESHCapecitabine-
dc.subject.MESHDeoxycytidine/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHDeoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Resistance, Neoplasm*-
dc.subject.MESHEpothilones/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHEurope-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHFluorouracil/analogs & derivatives-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHKaplan-Meier Estimate-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHProportional Hazards Models-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Assessment-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHSouth America-
dc.subject.MESHTaxoids/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHTubulin Modulators/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHUnited States-
dc.titleAnalysis of overall survival from a phase III study of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGabriel N. Hortobagyi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHenry L. Gomez-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRubi K. Li-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun-Cheol Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLuis E. Fein-
dc.contributor.googleauthorValorie F. Chan-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJacek Jassem-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGuillermo L. Lerzo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorXavier B. Pivot-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFernando Hurtado de Mendoza-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBinghe Xu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLinda T. Vahdat-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRonald A. Peck-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPralay Mukhopadhyay-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHenri H. Roché-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10549-010-0901-4-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03773-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00403-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7217-
dc.identifier.pmid20454927-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-010-0901-4-
dc.subject.keywordEpothilone-
dc.subject.keywordIxabepilone-
dc.subject.keywordMetastatic breast cancer-
dc.subject.keywordOverall survival-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Hyun Cheol-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Hyun Cheol-
dc.citation.volume122-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage409-
dc.citation.endPage418-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.122(2) : 409-418, 2010-
dc.identifier.rimsid51036-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.