4 428

Cited 41 times in

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin: An 8-Week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study in Korean patients with Hypercholesterolemia

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이상학-
dc.contributor.author정남식-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-21T16:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-21T16:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.issn0149-2918-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/95916-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Although previous studies have examined the efficacy of pitavastatin, its tolerability and effects on lipid concentrations have not been compared with those of atorvastatin in a multicenter, randomized study. OBJECTIVE: This trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in hypercholesterolemic Korean adults. METHODS: This 8-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study was conducted at 18 clinical centers in Korea between May 2005 and February 2006. After a 4-week dietary lead-in period, patients with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/d or atorvastatin 10 mg/d. Patients who had not reached the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal by week 4 received a double dose of the assigned medication for an additional 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated in terms of achievement of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III LDL-C goals and changes from baseline in other lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). The tolerability profile was assessed by physical and electro-cardiographic examinations, laboratory tests, and recording adverse reactions at all visits. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients were randomized to treatment, and 222 (82.8%) completed the study (149 women, 73 men; mean age, 59 years; mean weight, 63.5 kg). At the end of the study, there was no significant difference between the pitavastatin and atorvastatin groups in the proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C goal (92.7% [102/110] vs 92.0% [103/112], respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of the percent changes from baseline in LDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or hs-CRP. Twenty-six of 136 patients (19.1%) taking pitavastatin reported 35 treatment-emergent adverse reactions; 33 of 132 patients (25.0%) taking atorvastatin reported 39 treatment-emergent adverse reactions. Elevations in creatine kinase were observed in 6 patients (4.4%) in the pitavastatin group and 7 patients (5.3%) in the atorvastatin group. There were no serious adverse drug reactions in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In these adult Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia, pitavastatin and atorvastatin did not differ significantly in terms of the proportions of patients achievi-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent2365~2373-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL THERAPEUTICS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy and tolerability of pitavastatin and atorvastatin: An 8-Week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, dose-titration study in Korean patients with Hypercholesterolemia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang Hak Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNamsik Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Su Hyon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Wook Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi-Wan Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKwang-Soo Cha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Ho Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyeong Ho Yun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae Hoon Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWan-Joo Shim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYung Woo Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Gu Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHong Seog Seo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi Hoon Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Seung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChee Jeong Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Ho Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDoo-Il Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun Kwan-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.11.002-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03585-
dc.contributor.localIdA02833-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00614-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-114X-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291807003517-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Sang Hak-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Nam Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Nam Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Snag Hak-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume29-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage2365-
dc.citation.endPage2373-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, Vol.29(11) : 2365-2373, 2007-
dc.identifier.rimsid53287-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.