Cited 0 times in

폐암 환자의 기관지 세척 검체에 대한 고식적 세포도말검사, 세포 블록, 액상세포검사의 비교

Title
 폐암 환자의 기관지 세척 검체에 대한 고식적 세포도말검사, 세포 블록, 액상세포검사의 비교
Other Titles
 Comparison of Conventional Smear, Cell Block and Liquid-based Preparation in the Evaluation of Bronchial Washing Specimen in Lung Cancer Patients
Authors
 임현이; 주희재; 홍순원; 김영배
Issue Date
2011
Journal Title
 Korean Journal of Pathology
ISSN
 1738-1843
Citation
 Korean Journal of Pathology, Vol.45(3) : 296~302, 2011
Abstract
Background: The preparation of conventional smears (CS) from mucoid samples, despite mucolysis, can pose difficulties for cytotechnologists or cytopathologists. In recent years, liquid-based cytology (LBC) devices have been developed in attempts to improve the cytopreparation process. LBC improves both sample collection and sample preparation. Cell block preparations (CB) can be made from residual tissue fluids, and are a useful adjunct to smears. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 3 preparations from 209 patients whose diagnosis was later confirmed via bronchoscopic biopsy, fine needle aspiration, gun biopsy or operation. Each case was categorized into one of three groups: “negative,” “atypical or suspicious” and “malignant.” Results: When conflating the “atypical” and “malignant” categories into a “positive” category, the sensitivity of each preparation was 74.4% in LBC, 72.9% in CS, and 76.5% in CB preparations. Specificity was 98.7%, 94.7% and 98.7%, respectively. By combining LBC and CB, the sensitivity is 78.2%. Conclusions: Among three different preparation methods, sensitivity is highest in the CB method. LBC has many advantages in evaluating cell morphology and by combining CB method, the sensitivity can be improved slightly. The application of all three methods may prove helpful when one or another method proves diagnostically inconclusive.
URI
http://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/93467
DOI
10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2011.45.3.296
Appears in Collections:
1. 연구논문 > 1. College of Medicine > Dept. of Pathology
Yonsei Authors
사서에게 알리기
  feedback
Files in This Item:
T201102251.pdfDownload
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse