3 490

Cited 81 times in

Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer: comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival

Authors
 Seung Hyuk Baik  ;  Mikhail Gincherman  ;  Matthew G. Mutch  ;  Elisa H. Birnbaum  ;  James W. Fleshman 
Citation
 DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, Vol.54(1) : 6-14, 2011 
Journal Title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN
 0012-3706 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to assess the safety and oncologic feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer vs open rectal resection as a phase II pilot study for a planned randomized control trial.

METHODS: A case-matched controlled prospective analysis of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection for stage I to III (no T4) rectal cancer within 12 cm of the anal verge from 2002 to 2005 was performed. Patients were matched with contemporary patients who underwent open rectal cancer surgery (n = 108) in a 1 to 2 fashion. The perioperative clinical outcomes, postoperative pathology, and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS: The demographic data did not differ significantly between the groups. The laparoscopic group manifested early return of bowel function (P = .003). The complication rate was 22.2% in the laparoscopic group and 32.4% in the open group (P = .178). Local recurrence was similar (2.0% laparoscopic, 4.2% open, P = .417). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rate also were similar (overall survival, 90.8% laparoscopic, 88.5% open, P = .261; disease-free survival, 80.8% laparoscopic, 75.8% open. P = .390).

CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer was acceptable in terms of oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinical outcomes. The present data are the basis for a large-scale randomized trial for comparison of laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgeries (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z6051).
Full Text
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00003453-201101000-00003&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
DOI
10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd19d0
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Baik, Seung Hyuk(백승혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4183-2332
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/93001
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links