1 650

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose amlodipine/losartan and losartan in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with losartan: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author조승연-
dc.contributor.author홍범기-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T16:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T16:22:38Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1175-3277-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/89411-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combination drugs may enhance blood pressure (BP) goal attainment through complementary effects and reduced side effects, which leads to better compliance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of once-daily combination amlodipine/losartan versus losartan. METHODS: This was an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase III study conducted in outpatient hospital clinics. Korean patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on losartan 100 mg were administered amlodipine/losartan 5 mg/100 mg combination versus losartan 100 mg. The main outcome measures were changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and BP response rate from baseline values, which were assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: At week 8, both groups achieved significant reductions from baseline in DBP (11.7 ± 7.0 and 3.2 ± 7.9 mmHg), which was significantly greater in the amlodipine/losartan 5 mg/100 mg combination (n = 70) group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the amlodipine/losartan 5 mg/100 mg combination group achieved significantly greater reductions in SBP at week 8 and in SBP and DBP at week 4 compared with the losartan 100 mg (n = 72) group (all p < 0.0001). Response rates were significantly higher in the amlodipine/losartan 5 mg/100 mg group versus the losartan 100 mg group (81.4% vs 63.9% at week 4, p < 0.0192; 90.0% vs 66.7% at week 8, p < 0.001). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Switching to a fixed-dose combination therapy of amlodipine/losartan 5 mg/100 mg was associated with significantly greater reductions in BP and superior achievement of BP goals compared with a maintenance dose of losartan 100 mg in Korean patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on losartan 100 mg.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAmlodipine/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHAmlodipine/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAmlodipine/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAntihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHAntihypertensive Agents/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHBlood Pressure/drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHCalcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHCalcium Channel Blockers/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHCalcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHDouble-Blind Method-
dc.subject.MESHDrug Combinations-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHHypertension/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHHypertension/physiopathology-
dc.subject.MESHLosartan/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHLosartan/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHLosartan/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleComparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose amlodipine/losartan and losartan in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with losartan: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBum-Kee Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Gyu Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Sik Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong Ho Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHo Joong Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Han Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Young Yang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Jin Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorProf. Seung Yun Cho-
dc.identifier.doi22462558-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA03844-
dc.contributor.localIdA04394-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00072-
dc.identifier.eissn1179-187X-
dc.identifier.pmid22462558-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.2165%2F11597410-000000000-00000-
dc.subject.keywordDiastolic Blood Pressure-
dc.subject.keywordLosartan-
dc.subject.keywordAmlodipine-
dc.subject.keywordValsartan-
dc.subject.keywordCombination Group-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Seung Yun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Bum Kee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Seung Yun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Bum Kee-
dc.citation.volume12-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage189-
dc.citation.endPage195-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, Vol.12(3) : 189-195, 2012-
dc.identifier.rimsid31745-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.