4 819

Cited 3 times in

Clinical outcomes following secondary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion due to previous stent migration in malignant colorectal obstruction

Authors
 A. Ra Choi  ;  Jin Young Yoon  ;  Hyun Jung Lee  ;  Hui Won Jang  ;  Soo Jung Park  ;  Sung Pil Hong  ;  Tae Il Kim  ;  Won Ho Kim  ;  Jae Hee Cheon 
Citation
 SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.27(9) : 3288-3296, 2013 
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration/therapy* ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction/etiology* ; Intestinal Obstruction/therapy* ; Male ; Metals ; Middle Aged ; Retreatment ; Stents* ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms/complications* ; Female ; Foreign-Body Migration/therapy* ; Humans ; Intestinal Obstruction/etiology* ; Intestinal Obstruction/therapy* ; Male ; Metals ; Middle Aged ; Retreatment ; Stents* ; Treatment Outcome
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
There has been no research on the clinical outcomes of secondary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement after initial stent migration. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of secondary SEMS placement after initial stent migration compared to the outcomes of secondary SEMS placement done for reasons other than migration and identify factors predictive of long-term outcomes.
METHODS:
Between January 2005 and February 2011, a total of 422 patients underwent SEMS insertion for malignant colorectal obstruction at Severance Hospital. Of these, there were 98 cases of secondary SEMS placement, 38 of which were due to previous stent migration. We compared the clinical outcomes of secondary SEMS between stent migration and nonmigration groups. We also sought to identify risk factors for long-term outcomes of secondary SEMS after initial stent migration.
RESULTS:
The baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. The technical and clinical success rates of secondary SEMS insertion in the migration and nonmigration groups were 94.7% and 83.3% (p = 0.09) and 73.7% and 53.3% (p = 0.122), respectively. In the migration group, sustained clinical success after secondary SEMS was associated with the absence of complications after insertion of the first stent (p < 0.001) and a longer time interval (more than 100 days) between the first and second stent insertion (p = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS:
Our data showed that secondary colorectal SEMS after stent migration is safe and effective. Moreover, the sustained clinical success of the secondary stent following migration was dependent on the outcomes of the first stent.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-013-2907-6
DOI
10.1007/s00464-013-2907-6
Appears in Collections:
6. Others (기타) > Dept. of Health Promotion (건강의학과) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Won Ho(김원호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9972
Kim, Tae Il(김태일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-890X
Park, Soo Jung(박수정)
Lee, Hyun Jung(이현정)
Jang, Hui Won(장희원)
Cheon, Jae Hee(천재희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-8904
Choi, A Ra(최아라)
Hong, Sung Pil(홍성필)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87548
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links