4 666

Cited 53 times in

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Cytologically Proven Node-positive Breast Cancer at Diagnosis

Authors
 Seho Park  ;  Ji Min Park  ;  Jung Hoon Cho  ;  Hyung Seok Park  ;  Seung Il Kim  ;  Byeong-Woo Park 
Citation
 ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.20(9) : 2858-2865, 2013 
Journal Title
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 1068-9265 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Axilla ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology ; Combined Modality Therapy ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes/pathology* ; Lymph Nodes/surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy* ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Keywords
False negative rate ; Fine needle aspiration cytology ; Identification rate ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Abstract
Background
The performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) was investigated in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
Methods
After NCT of 178 patients with cytology-proven axillary/supraclavicular nodes metastasis at the time of diagnosis, SLNB using radioisotope was performed including completion node dissection between 2008 and 2011. The detection rate, sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of SLNB were analyzed.
Results
SLNB was successfully performed in 169 (94.9 %) patients. Tumor nonresponse and extensive residual nodal disease were found to be significantly associated with detection failure of sentinel nodes. Sensitivity, FNR, NPV, and accuracy of SLNB were 78.0, 22.0, 75.8, and 87.0 %, respectively, and a greater number of retrieved SLNs increased all four of these performance measures. Conversion to node-negative disease was achieved in 69 (40.8 %) patients: 24 % of patients with the luminal A subtype, 51.6 % of patients with the luminal B, 51.7 % of patients with the HER2-enriched, and 58.5 % of patients with the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. Luminal B, HER2-enriched, and TNBC subtypes showed comparable responses to NCT; however, the TNBC subtype had a significantly better FNR and accuracy.
Conclusions
SLNB was found to be technically feasible, but its routine use was not recommended for LABCs after NCT. However, acceptable performance was noted for locally advanced TNBCs, and thus SLNB might be safely considered in these selected patients.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-013-2992-8
DOI
10.1245/s10434-013-2992-8
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Seung Il(김승일)
Park, Byeong Woo(박병우) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-2607
Park, Se Ho(박세호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-2755
Park, Ji Min(박지민)
Park, Hyung Seok(박형석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5322-6036
Cho, Jung Hoon(조정훈)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87398
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links