3 537

Cited 8 times in

Footprint Contact Restoration Between the Biceps-Labrum Complex and the Glenoid Rim in SLAP Repair: A Comparative Cadaveric Study Using Pressure-Sensitive Film

Authors
 Sung-Jae Kim  ;  Sung-Hwan Kim  ;  Su-Keon Lee  ;  Jae-Hoo Lee  ;  Yong-Min Chun 
Citation
 ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, Vol.29(6) : 1005-1011, 2013 
Journal Title
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY
ISSN
 0749-8063 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Aged ; Arm ; Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology ; Cadaver ; Female ; Humans ; Ligaments, Articular/injuries ; Ligaments, Articular/surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal/injuries ; Muscle, Skeletal/surgery* ; Pressure ; Scapula/injuries ; Scapula/surgery* ; Shoulder Joint/injuries ; Shoulder Joint/surgery* ; Suture Anchors* ; Suture Techniques* ; Sutures
Keywords
Aged ; Arm ; Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology ; Cadaver ; Female ; Humans ; Ligaments, Articular/injuries ; Ligaments, Articular/surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle, Skeletal/injuries ; Muscle, Skeletal/surgery* ; Pressure ; Scapula/injuries ; Scapula/surgery* ; Shoulder Joint/injuries ; Shoulder Joint/surgery* ; Suture Anchors* ; Suture Techniques* ; Sutures
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To compare pressurized footprint contact and interface pressure between the biceps-labrum complex and the superior glenoid rim after SLAP repair using 3 different techniques.
METHODS:
Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were divided into 3 groups. SLAP lesions were repaired by (1) 2 single-loaded anchors in a simple suture configuration (group T), (2) a double-loaded anchor in a simple suture configuration in a V shape (group V), or (3) a double-loaded anchor by use of a hybrid simple and mattress suture configuration (group H). Pressure-sensitive film quantified pressurized contact areas and interface pressures between the biceps-labrum complex and the glenoid rim after SLAP repair.
RESULTS:
Groups T and V showed significantly larger contact areas than group H (P < .0001). However, there was no significant difference between groups T and V. Despite a substantial contact area around the biceps-labrum complex in group T, there was a lack of sufficient contact area just below the biceps anchor. Group V showed a uniform contact area around the entire biceps-labrum complex, but in group H the contact area was concentrated only around the posterior superior labrum, where the simple suture was used.
CONCLUSIONS:
The methods using 2 single-loaded suture anchors and using 1 double-loaded suture anchor with a simple suture configuration showed significantly larger pressurized contact areas than the method using 1 double-loaded suture anchor with both a simple and mattress suture configuration. The interface pressure was not significantly different among groups.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE:
Although there have been several kinds of repair techniques and biomechanical studies for the type II SLAP lesion, there has been no study about footprint restoration on the superior glenoid rim. This study analyzed and compared the footprint contact restoration after type II SLAP repair among 3 different techniques.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806313001862
DOI
10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.005
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Jae(김성재)
Kim, Sung Hwan(김성환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-6241
Lee, Su Keon(이수건)
Lee, Jae Hoo(이재후)
Chun, Yong Min(천용민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8147-6136
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87024
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links