Cited 0 times in

Cost-effectiveness Outcomes of the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in South Korea

Title
Cost-effectiveness Outcomes of the National Gastric Cancer Screening Program in South Korea
Authors
Eun Cho;Moon Hae Kang;Eun-Cheol Park;Jae Kwan Jun;MiNa Suh;Kui Son Choi
Issue Date
2013
Journal Title
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
ISSN
1513-7368
Citation
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol.14(4) : 2533~2540, 2013
Abstract
Background: Although screening is necessary where gastric cancer is particularly common in Asia, the performance outcomes of mass screening programs have remained unclear. This study was conducted to evaluate cost-effectiveness outcomes of the national cancer screening program (NCSP) for gastric cancer in South Korea. Materials and Methods: People aged 40 years or over during 2002-2003 (baseline) were the target population. Screening recipients and patients diagnosed with gastric cancers were identified using the NCSP and Korea Central Cancer Registry databases. Clinical outcomes were measured in terms of mortality and life-years saved (LYS) of gastric cancer patients during 7 years based on merged data from the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation and National Statistical Office. We considered direct, indirect, and productivity-loss costs associated with screening attendance. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) estimates were produced according to screening method, sex, and age group compared to non-screening. Results: The age-adjusted ICER for survival was 260,201,000-371,011,000 Korean Won (KW; 1USD=1,088 KW) for the upper-gastrointestinal (UGI) tract over non-screening. Endoscopy ICERs were lower (119,099,000-178,700,000 KW/survival) than UGI. To increase 1 life-year, additional costs of approximately 14,466,000-15,014,000 KW and 8,817,000-9,755,000 KW were required for UGI and endoscopy, respectively. Endoscopy was the most cost-effective strategy for males and females. With regard to sensitivity analyses varying based on the upper age limit, endoscopy NCSP was dominant for both males and females. For males, an upper limit of age 75 or 80 years could be considered. ICER estimates for LYS indicate that the gastric cancer screening program in Korea is cost-effective. Conclusion: Endoscopy should be recommended as a first-line method in Korea because it is beneficial among the Korean population.
URI

http://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86779
DOI
10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.5.2533
Appears in Collections:
1. 연구논문 > 1. College of Medicine > Dept. of Preventive Medicine
Yonsei Authors
사서에게 알리기
  feedback
Files in This Item:
T201301331.pdfDownload
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse