0 105

Cited 0 times in

Marrow stimulation procedures for high-grade cartilage lesions during surgical repair of medial meniscus root tear yielded suboptimal outcomes, whilst small lesions showed surgical eligibility

Authors
 Hyun-Soo Moon  ;  Min Jung  ;  Chong-Hyuk Choi  ;  Je-Hyun Yoo  ;  Bum-Joon Nam  ;  Seung-Hun Lee  ;  Seung-Hwan Shin  ;  Dong-Ki Kim  ;  Sung-Hwan Kim 
Citation
 KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, Vol.31(12) : 5812-5822, 2023-12 
Journal Title
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
ISSN
 0942-2056 
Issue Date
2023-12
MeSH
Arthroscopy / methods ; Bone Marrow / pathology ; Cartilage, Articular* / pathology ; Cartilage, Articular* / surgery ; Humans ; Menisci, Tibial / surgery ; Osteoarthritis* / surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture / pathology ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Cartilage lesion ; Marrow stimulation procedure ; Medial meniscus root tear ; Microdrilling ; Microfracture ; Pull-out repair
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the surgical outcomes of arthroscopic pull-out repair for medial meniscus root tear (MMRT) combined with the marrow stimulation procedures (MSP) for accompanying high-grade cartilage lesions. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic pull-out repair for MMRT between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had at least 3 years of follow-up were included and classified into two groups according to whether MSP (microfracture or microdrilling) were performed on cartilage lesions in the medial tibiofemoral joint (group 1, patients with International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 0-3a lesions and did not undergo MSP; group 2, patients with ICRS grade 3b-3d lesions and underwent MSP). Comparative analyses, including non-inferiority trials, were conducted between groups for subjective and objective outcomes. In addition, group 2 was further divided into two subgroups according to cartilage lesion size and compared with group 1 (group S, 2.0 cm(2)). RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included (group 1, 68 patients; group 2, 26 patients). There were no significant differences in clinical scores at postoperative 3 years and final follow-up between groups 1 and 2, but group 2 failed to satisfy the non-inferiority criteria compared to group 1 overall. In objective outcomes, group 2 did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for the rate of osteoarthritis progression compared to group 1, and it also showed a significantly higher proportion of high-grade osteoarthritis at final follow-up (P = 0.044) and a higher degree of osteoarthritis progression than group 1 (P = 0.03 for pre- to postoperative 3 years, and P = 0.006 for pre- to final follow-up). In additional evaluations comparing the subgroups of group 2 and group 1, group S showed relatively favourable results compared to group L in objective outcomes at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent arthroscopic pull-out repair for MMRT combined with MSP for accompanying high-grade cartilage lesions showed suboptimal outcomes compared to those with no or low-grade lesions at mid-term follow-up. High-grade cartilage lesions
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1007/s00167-023-07642-2
DOI
10.1007/s00167-023-07642-2
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Hwan(김성환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5743-6241
Moon, Hyun-Soo(문현수)
Jung, Min(정민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-4802
Choi, Chong Hyuk(최종혁) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-4904
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197823
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links