40 83

Cited 2 times in

Bintrafusp Alfa Versus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Programmed Death-Ligand 1-High Advanced NSCLC: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

Authors
 Byoung Chul Cho  ;  Jong Seok Lee  ;  Yi-Long Wu  ;  Irfan Cicin  ;  Manuel Cobo Dols  ;  Myung-Ju Ahn  ;  Kristof Cuppens  ;  Rémi Veillon  ;  Ernest Nadal  ;  Josiane Mourão Dias  ;  Claudio Martin  ;  Martin Reck  ;  Edward B Garon  ;  Enriqueta Felip  ;  Luis Paz-Ares  ;  Francoise Mornex  ;  Everett E Vokes  ;  Alex A Adjei  ;  Clifford Robinson  ;  Masashi Sato  ;  Yulia Vugmeyster  ;  Andreas Machl  ;  Francois Audhuy  ;  Surendra Chaudhary  ;  Fabrice Barlesi 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, Vol.18(12) : 1731-1742, 2023-12 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 1556-0864 
Issue Date
2023-12
MeSH
B7-H1 Antigen / metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* ; Humans ; Immunologic Factors / therapeutic use ; Lung Neoplasms*
Keywords
Bintrafusp alfa ; NSCLC ; PD-L1 ; Phase 3
Abstract
Introduction: Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), has exhibited clinical activity in a phase 1 expansion cohort of patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC.

Methods: This adaptive phase 3 trial (NCT03631706) compared the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment in patients with PD-L1-high advanced NSCLC. Primary end points were progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 per independent review committee and overall survival.

Results: Patients (N = 304) were randomized one-to-one to receive either bintrafusp alfa or pembrolizumab (n = 152 each). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.1-16.0 mo) for bintrafusp alfa and 14.5 months (95% CI: 13.1-15.9 mo) for pembrolizumab. Progression-free survival by independent review committee was not significantly different between bintrafusp alfa and pembrolizumab arms (median = 7.0 mo [95% CI: 4.2 mo-not reached (NR)] versus 11.1 mo [95% CI: 8.1 mo-NR]; hazard ratio = 1.232 [95% CI: 0.885-1.714]). The median overall survival was 21.1 months (95% CI: 21.1 mo-NR) for bintrafusp alfa and 22.1 months (95% CI: 20.4 mo-NR) for pembrolizumab (hazard ratio = 1.201 [95% CI: 0.796-1.811]). Treatment-related adverse events were higher with bintrafusp alfa versus pembrolizumab; grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42.4% versus 13.2% of patients, respectively. The study was discontinued at an interim analysis as it was unlikely to meet the primary end point.

Conclusions: First-line treatment with bintrafusp alfa did not exhibit superior efficacy compared with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-high, advanced NSCLC.
Files in This Item:
T202307151.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.018
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Cho, Byoung Chul(조병철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-270X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/197507
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links