525 151

Cited 51 times in

Five-Year Outcomes With Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 1% in the KEYNOTE-042 Study

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author조병철-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T07:07:31Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-09T07:07:31Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.issn0732-183X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/196059-
dc.description.abstractClinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report 5-year results from the phase III KEYNOTE-042 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02220894). Eligible patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR/ALK alterations and with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1% received pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks for 35 cycles or chemotherapy (carboplatin + paclitaxel or pemetrexed) for 4-6 cycles with optional maintenance pemetrexed. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, ≥ 20%, and ≥ 1% groups. Patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab with ≥ stable disease could begin second-course pembrolizumab upon progression. One thousand two hundred seventy-four patients were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab, n = 637; chemotherapy, n = 637). Median follow-up time was 61.1 (range, 50.0-76.3) months. OS outcomes favored pembrolizumab (v chemotherapy) regardless of PD-L1 TPS (hazard ratio [95% CI] for TPS ≥ 50%, 0.68 [0.57 to 0.81]; TPS ≥ 20%, 0.75 [0.64 to 0.87]; TPS ≥ 1%, 0.79 [0.70 to 0.89]), with estimated 5-year OS rates with pembrolizumab of 21.9%, 19.4%, and 16.6%, respectively. No new toxicities were identified. Objective response rate was 84.3% among 102 patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab and 15.2% among 33 patients who received second-course pembrolizumab. First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to show durable clinical benefit versus chemotherapy after 5 years of follow-up in PD-L1-positive, locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations and remains a standard of care.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHB7-H1 Antigen / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCarboplatin / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHErbB Receptors-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms* / drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHPaclitaxel / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHPemetrexed / therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases / therapeutic use-
dc.titleFive-Year Outcomes With Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Programmed Death Ligand-1 Tumor Proportion Score ≥ 1% in the KEYNOTE-042 Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGilberto de Castro Jr-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIveta Kudaba-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYi-Long Wu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGilberto Lopes-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDariusz M Kowalski-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHande Z Turna-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChristian Caglevic-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLi Zhang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBoguslawa Karaszewska-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKonstantin K Laktionov-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVichien Srimuninnimit-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIgor Bondarenko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKaoru Kubota-
dc.contributor.googleauthorRinee Mukherjee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJianxin Lin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorFabricio Souza-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTony S K Mok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByoung Chul Cho-
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JCO.21.02885-
dc.contributor.localIdA03822-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01331-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-7755-
dc.identifier.pmid36306479-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Byoung Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor조병철-
dc.citation.volume41-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage1986-
dc.citation.endPage1991-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, Vol.41(11) : 1986-1991, 2023-04-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.