0 222

Cited 7 times in

Outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for imperative vs elective indications

Authors
 Jo-Lynn S Tan  ;  Niranjan Sathianathen  ;  Marcus Cumberbatch  ;  Prokar Dasgupta  ;  Alexandre Mottrie  ;  Ronney Abaza  ;  Koon Ho Rha  ;  Thyavihally B Yuvaraja  ;  Dipen J Parekh  ;  Umberto Capitanio  ;  Rajesh Ahlawat  ;  Sudhir Rawal  ;  Nicolò M Buffi  ;  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman  ;  Kris K Maes  ;  Gagan Gautam  ;  Francesco Porpiglia  ;  Levent Turkeri  ;  Mahendra Bhandari  ;  Benjamin Challacombe  ;  James Roscoe Porter  ;  Craig R Rogers  ;  Daniel A Moon 
Citation
 BJU INTERNATIONAL, Vol.128(suppl 3) : 30-35, 2021-12 
Journal Title
BJU INTERNATIONAL
ISSN
 1464-4096 
Issue Date
2021-12
MeSH
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Blood Transfusion ; Databases, Factual ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Kidney Neoplasms / surgery* ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy / adverse effects ; Nephrectomy / methods* ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications / etiology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects ; Warm Ischemia
Keywords
imperative indications ; partial nephrectomy ; renal cancer ; robot-assisted
Abstract
Objectives: To assess and compare peri-operative outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for imperative vs elective indications.

Patient and methods: We retrospectively reviewed a multinational database of 3802 adults who underwent RAPN for elective and imperative indications. Laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy (PN) were excluded. Baseline data for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and PADUA score were examined. Patients undergoing RAPN for an imperative indication were matched to those having surgery for an elective indication using propensity scores in a 1:3 ratio. Primary outcomes included organ ischaemic time, operating time, estimated blood loss (EBL), rate of blood transfusions, Clavien-Dindo complications, conversion to radical nephrectomy (RN) and positive surgical margin (PSM) status.

Results: After propensity-score matching for baseline variables, a total of 304 patients (76 imperative vs 228 elective indications) were included in the final analysis. No significant differences were found between groups for ischaemia time (19.9 vs 19.8 min; P = 0.94), operating time (186 vs 180 min; P = 0.55), EBL (217 vs 190 mL; P = 0.43), rate of blood transfusions (2.7% vs 3.7%; P = 0.51), or Clavien-Dindo complications (P = 0.31). A 38.6% (SD 47.9) decrease in Day-1 postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in the imperative indication group and an 11.3% (SD 45.1) decrease was observed in the elective indication group (P < 0.005). There were no recorded cases of permanent or temporary dialysis. There were no conversions to RN in the imperative group, and seven conversions (5.6%) in the elective group (P = 0.69). PSMs were seen in 1.4% (1/76) of the imperative group and in 3.3% of the elective group (7/228; P = 0.69).

Conclusion: We conclude that RAPN is feasible and safe for imperative indications and demonstrates similar outcomes to those achieved for elective indications.
Full Text
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15581
DOI
10.1111/bju.15581
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Koon Ho(나군호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-7584
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/192399
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links