109 189

Cited 3 times in

Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices

Authors
 Bo Yi Kim  ;  Ikhyun Jun 
Citation
 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol.36(4) : 338-349, 2022-08 
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
ISSN
 1011-8942 
Issue Date
2022-08
MeSH
Biometry ; Cataract* ; Cornea* ; Corneal Topography ; Humans ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, Optical Coherence / methods
Keywords
Cataract extraction ; Corneal topography ; Intraocular lens implantation ; Tonometry
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical availability of a multifunctional ocular biometric unit, MR-6000, for simultaneous keratometry, tonometry, topography, and pachymetry evaluation, and compare anterior segment measurements with five other devices: autokeratometer (KR-1), Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR), swept-source optical coherence tomography (IOLMaster 700), Placido disk scanning-slit topography (Orbscan II), and noncontact tonometry (FT-1000).

Methods: Thirty eyes from thirty patients who visited Severance Hospital for cataract surgery were examined using MR6000 and the other devices. The mean keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW) distance, and intraocular pressure (IOP) values were compared. Repeated measures analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot were used to assess the correlation and agreement between devices.

Results: Thirty eyes of thirty patients were evaluated. Statistically significant differences in mean keratometry between MR6000, KR-1, Pentacam HR, and IOLMaster 700 were not observed (p > 0.05). All five devices, including Orbscan II, had almost perfect agreement in measuring keratometry (ICC > 0.80, p < 0.05). CCT measured by MR-6000 was significantly different from that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (p < 0.05) but correlated with that of Pentacam HR and Orbscan II measurements (ICC > 0.60, p < 0.05). The WTW distance measured by MR-6000 was not significantly different from that measured by IOLMaster 700 but was different from that measured by Orbscan II. IOP measured by MR-6000 was not correlated with FT-1000.

Conclusions: Keratometric values obtained through MR-6000 can be used interchangeably with other devices based on good correlation and agreement. However, the CCT, WTW, and IOP values were not interchangeable with a single multifunctional unit for cataract surgery preoperative examination.
Files in This Item:
T202204519.pdf Download
DOI
10.3341/kjo.2022.0025
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Jun, Ik Hyun(전익현) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2160-1679
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/191757
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links