0 206

Cited 25 times in

Characteristics and prognosis of 17 special histologic subtypes of invasive breast cancers according to World Health Organization classification: comparative analysis to invasive carcinoma of no special type

Authors
 Jiyoung Kim  ;  Jee Ye Kim  ;  Han-Byoel Lee  ;  Young Joo Lee  ;  Min-Ki Seong  ;  Namsun Paik  ;  Woo-Chan Park  ;  Sungmin Park  ;  Seung Pil Jung  ;  Soo Youn Bae 
Citation
 BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.184(2) : 527-542, 2020-11 
Journal Title
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
ISSN
 0167-6806 
Issue Date
2020-11
MeSH
Breast ; Breast Neoplasms* / epidemiology ; Carcinoma* ; Female ; Humans ; Prognosis ; World Health Organization
Keywords
Breast cancer ; Histology ; Lobular ; Mucinous ; Tubular ; Papillary ; Medullary ; Metaplastic ; Micropapillary ; Apocrine ; Cribriform
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with various histopathologic subtypes. Except for invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST), other subtypes are rare with limited data. The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics and prognosis of special histopathologic subtypes of breast cancer compared to NST. Methods A total of 136,140 patients were analyzed using the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry database between January 1996 and March 2019. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of special type breast carcinoma were compared with those of NST. Results The prevalence of special subtypes other than NST was 13.7% (n = 18,633). Compared to NST, patients with lobular, medullary, metaplastic, and micropapillary carcinoma had larger tumors (p < 0.001). Patients with mucinous, tubular, medullary, metaplastic, and cribriform carcinoma presented with less node metastasis (p < 0.001), contrary to patients with micropapillary carcinoma. Patients with lobular, mucinous, tubular, papillary, and cribriform carcinoma presented as luminal A subtype much more often (p < 0.001). Micropapillary carcinoma included more luminal B subtype (p < 0.001). Typically, medullary and metaplastic carcinoma included more triple-negative subtypes (p < 0.001). In survival analysis, only medullary (Hazard Ratio (HzR) 0.542, 95% CI 0.345 to 0.852,p = 0.008) and metaplastic carcinoma (HzR 1.655, 95% CI 1.317 to 2.080,p < 0.001) showed significantly different overall survival from NST by multivariate analysis. Conclusion Breast cancer had distinct clinicopathologic features according to histopathologic subtype. However, special types of breast cancer had similar survival outcomes compared to NST when adjusting for other prognostic factors, except for metaplastic carcinoma and medullary carcinoma.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-020-05861-6
DOI
10.1007/s10549-020-05861-6
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jee Ye(김지예) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3936-4410
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/189937
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links