0 367

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of artery-based methods for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium on low-dose chest computed tomography

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author남경선-
dc.contributor.author서영주-
dc.contributor.author이계호-
dc.contributor.author이수지-
dc.contributor.author이혜정-
dc.contributor.author최병욱-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T17:17:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-28T17:17:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/187026-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To identify the optimal artery-based method for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on non-electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) among three methods. Methods: A total of 120 asymptomatic subjects who underwent both LDCT and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Three cardiothoracic radiologists independently assessed CAC severity on LDCT (1.25-mm and 2.5-mm slice thickness) and classified it into four categories (none, mild, moderate, or severe) using three artery-based ordinal scoring methods (extent-based scoring, Weston scoring, and length-based scoring). Inter- and intra-observer CAC severity agreements of each method were assessed by Fleiss kappa statistics. Agreements between each method and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT were assessed by weighted kappa statistics. Results: The inter-observer agreement was highest with length-based method for both 1.25-mm (Fleiss kappa 0.735 for extent-based method, 0.801 for Weston score, and 0.813 for length-based method) and 2.5-mm slice thickness evaluation (Fleiss kappa 0.755 for extent-based method, 0.776 for Weston score, and 0.833 for extent-based method). Agreement across the three grading methods for the same observer was poor to moderate on 1.25-mm (Fleiss kappa 0.379-0.441) and moderate on 2.5-mm thickness evaluation (Fleiss kappa 0.427-0.461). Agreement of CAC severity between each method and ECG-gated calcium scoring CT was highest with the length-based method for all three observers on both 1.25-mm (weighted kappa 0.773-0.786) and 2.5-mm (weighted kappa 0.794-0.825) LDCT images. Conclusion: Among the three artery-based ordinal grading methods, the length-based method appears to be the most reliable for evaluating CAC on non-ECG-gated LDCT. Key points: • The length-based method showed the highest inter-observer agreement and the highest agreement with the ECG-gated calcium scoring CT, compared with the extent-based method and the Weston score.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.subject.MESHCalcium*-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Artery Disease* / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCoronary Vessels / diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleComparison of artery-based methods for ordinal grading of coronary artery calcium on low-dose chest computed tomography-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSuji Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Joo Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyungsun Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyeho Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye-Jeong Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByoung Wook Choi-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-021-07987-7-
dc.contributor.localIdA05862-
dc.contributor.localIdA01892-
dc.contributor.localIdA02665-
dc.contributor.localIdA05590-
dc.contributor.localIdA03320-
dc.contributor.localIdA04059-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid33885959-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00330-021-07987-7-
dc.subject.keywordCalcium-
dc.subject.keywordCoronary vessels-
dc.subject.keywordObserver variation-
dc.subject.keywordThorax-
dc.subject.keywordTomography, X-ray computed-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNam, Kyungsun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor남경선-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor서영주-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이계호-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이수지-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이혜정-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor최병욱-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage8108-
dc.citation.endPage8115-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.31(11) : 8108-8115, 2021-11-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.