Cited 24 times in
Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김만득 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 이주용 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 조강수 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 최영득 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 함원식 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-20T07:31:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-20T07:31:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160263 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of different PCNL procedures, including total tubeless, tubeless with stent, small-bore tube, and large-bore tube PCNLs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE™ databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published before December 30, 2013. One researcher examined all titles and abstracts found by the searches. Two investigators independently evaluated the full-text articles to determine whether those met the inclusion criteria. Qualities of included studies were rated with Cochrane's risk-of-bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final syntheses including pairwise and network meta-analyses. Operation time, pain scores, and transfusion rates were not significantly different between PCNL procedures. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless PCNL may be superior to standard PCNL (mean difference [MD] 0.65, 95% CI 0.14-1.13) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD -1.14, 95% CI -1.65--0.62), and small-bore PCNL may be superior to tubeless PCNL with stent (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.27-2.26). Network meta-analyses also showed that for length of hospital stay, total tubeless (MD 1.33, 95% CI 0.23-2.43) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.19-1.79) may be superior to standard PCNL. In rank probability tests, small-bore tube and total tubeless PCNLs were superior for operation time, pain scores, and hemoglobin changes. CONCLUSIONS: For hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and small-bore PCNLs may be superior to other methods. For hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | BMC UROLOGY | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/ | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Feasibility Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Humans | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Intraoperative Care/instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Intraoperative Care/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Kidney Calculi/diagnosis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Kidney Calculi/surgery | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Length of Stay/trends | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Network Meta-Analysis | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Postoperative Care/instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Postoperative Care/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods* | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Retrospective Studies | - |
dc.subject.MESH | Treatment Outcome | - |
dc.title | Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Radiology | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Joo Yong Lee | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Seong Uk Jeh | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Man Deuk Kim | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Dong Hyuk Kang | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Jong Kyou Kwon | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Won Sik Ham | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Young Deuk Choi | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | Kang Su Cho | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A00420 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03161 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03801 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04111 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A04337 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J00379 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-2490 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28655317 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Bayes theorem | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Calculi | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Lithotripsy | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Nephrostomy | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Percutaneous | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Kim, Man Deuk | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Joo Yong | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Cho, Kang Su | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Choi, Young Deuk | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Ham, Won Sik | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Man Deuk | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Joo Yong | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cho, Kang Su | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Choi, Young Deuk | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Ham, Won Sik | - |
dc.citation.volume | 17 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 48 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | BMC UROLOGY, Vol.17(1) : 48, 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 38392 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.