323 695

Cited 24 times in

Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김만득-
dc.contributor.author이주용-
dc.contributor.author조강수-
dc.contributor.author최영득-
dc.contributor.author함원식-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T07:31:57Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T07:31:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160263-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of different PCNL procedures, including total tubeless, tubeless with stent, small-bore tube, and large-bore tube PCNLs. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE™ databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published before December 30, 2013. One researcher examined all titles and abstracts found by the searches. Two investigators independently evaluated the full-text articles to determine whether those met the inclusion criteria. Qualities of included studies were rated with Cochrane's risk-of-bias assessment tool. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the final syntheses including pairwise and network meta-analyses. Operation time, pain scores, and transfusion rates were not significantly different between PCNL procedures. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless PCNL may be superior to standard PCNL (mean difference [MD] 0.65, 95% CI 0.14-1.13) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD -1.14, 95% CI -1.65--0.62), and small-bore PCNL may be superior to tubeless PCNL with stent (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.27-2.26). Network meta-analyses also showed that for length of hospital stay, total tubeless (MD 1.33, 95% CI 0.23-2.43) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.19-1.79) may be superior to standard PCNL. In rank probability tests, small-bore tube and total tubeless PCNLs were superior for operation time, pain scores, and hemoglobin changes. CONCLUSIONS: For hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and small-bore PCNLs may be superior to other methods. For hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBioMed Central-
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC UROLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHFeasibility Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIntraoperative Care/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHIntraoperative Care/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHKidney Calculi/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHKidney Calculi/surgery-
dc.subject.MESHLength of Stay/trends-
dc.subject.MESHNephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHNephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHNetwork Meta-Analysis-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Care/instrumentation-
dc.subject.MESHPostoperative Care/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleIntraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoo Yong Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong Uk Jeh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMan Deuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Hyuk Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Kyou Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Sik Ham-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Deuk Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKang Su Cho-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x-
dc.contributor.localIdA00420-
dc.contributor.localIdA03161-
dc.contributor.localIdA03801-
dc.contributor.localIdA04111-
dc.contributor.localIdA04337-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00379-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2490-
dc.identifier.pmid28655317-
dc.subject.keywordBayes theorem-
dc.subject.keywordCalculi-
dc.subject.keywordLithotripsy-
dc.subject.keywordMeta-analysis-
dc.subject.keywordNephrostomy-
dc.subject.keywordPercutaneous-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Man Deuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Joo Yong-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Kang Su-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHam, Won Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Man Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Joo Yong-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Kang Su-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHam, Won Sik-
dc.citation.volume17-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage48-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationBMC UROLOGY, Vol.17(1) : 48, 2017-
dc.identifier.rimsid38392-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.