184 417

Cited 27 times in

Medical history for prognostic risk assessment and diagnosis of stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Authors
 James K. Min  ;  Allison Dunning  ;  Heidi Gransar  ;  Stephan Achenbach  ;  Fay Y. Lin  ;  Mouaz Al-Mallah  ;  Matthew J. Budoff  ;  Tracy Q. Callister  ;  Hyuk-Jae Chang  ;  Filippo Cademartiri  ;  Kavitha Chinnaiyan  ;  Benjamin J. W. Chow  ;  Ralph D’Agostino  ;  Augustin DeLago  ;  John Friedman  ;  Martin Hadamitzky  ;  Joerg Hausleiter  ;  Sean Hayes  ;  Philipp Kaufmann  ;  Gilbert L. Raff  ;  Leslee J. Shaw  ;  Louise Thomson  ;  Todd Villines  ;  Ricardo C. Cury  ;  Gudrun Feuchtner  ;  Yong-Jin Kim  ;  Jonathon Leipsic  ;  Daniel S. Berman  ;  Michael Pencina 
Citation
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.128(8) : 871-878, 2015 
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
ISSN
 0002-9343 
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Adolescent ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/complications ; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis* ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical History Taking* ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis ; Myocardial Infarction/mortality ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment/methods* ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult
Keywords
Coronary artery disease ; Diagnosis ; Prognosis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical cardiac risk algorithm for stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease based upon angina typicality and coronary artery disease risk factors.

METHODS: Between 2004 and 2011, 14,004 adults with suspected coronary artery disease referred for cardiac imaging were followed: 1) 9093 patients for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) followed for 2.0 years (CCTA-1); 2) 2132 patients for CCTA followed for 1.6 years (CCTA-2); and 3) 2779 patients for exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) followed for 5.0 years. A best-fit model from CCTA-1 for prediction of death or myocardial infarction was developed, with integer values proportional to regression coefficients. Discrimination was assessed using C-statistic. The validated model was tested for estimation of the likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease, defined as ≥50% stenosis, as compared with the method of Diamond and Forrester. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included prevalent angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease.

RESULTS: In CCTA-1, best-fit model discriminated individuals at risk of death or myocardial infarction (C-statistic 0.76). The integer model ranged from 3 to 13, corresponding to 3-year death risk or myocardial infarction of 0.25% to 53.8%. When applied to CCTA-2 and MPS cohorts, the model demonstrated C-statistics of 0.71 and 0.77, respectively. Both best-fit (C = 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746-0.771) and integer models (C = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.693-0.719) performed better than Diamond and Forrester (C = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.628-0.659) for estimating obstructive coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS: For stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease, we developed a history-based method for prediction of death and obstructive coronary artery disease.
Files in This Item:
T201505771.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.031
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Chang, Hyuk-Jae(장혁재) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-7545
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/157166
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links