0 666

Cited 37 times in

Differences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06)

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author구자승-
dc.contributor.author김용배-
dc.contributor.author서창옥-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-26T16:45:36Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-26T16:45:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1526-8209-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/156791-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: We designed the present study to investigate differences in prognostic factors and failure patterns between patients with invasive micropapillary carcinoma or carcinoma with micropapillary component (IMPC) and randomly matched patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast at multiple institutions of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study was performed using subjects treated from January 1999 to November 2011. Female patients who had undergone curative resection for breast cancer without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were considered for this study. Exact matches were made for age (± 3 years), pathologic tumor and node stage, treatment method (surgery with or without radiotherapy), and period when surgery was performed (within 1 year) at the same institution. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 59 months in both groups. In the comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics, rates of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and nuclear grade III were both significantly higher in IMPC than in IDC (P < .001, P = .01, respectively). During the follow-up period, recurrences developed in 40 patients with IMPC (15.0%) and 21 with IDC (7.9%). Locoregional recurrence (LRR) developed in 22 patients with IMPC (8.2%) and 10 with IDC (3.7%). The rate of distant metastasis did not differ between the 2 groups (P = .52). LRR-free survival (P = .03) and recurrence-free survival (P = .007) were significantly different between the 2 groups, but overall survival was not (P = .67). CONCLUSION: IMPC is associated with a higher rate of LVI, high nuclear grade, and a propensity for LRR compared to IDC. Modification of the locoregional treatment modality might be needed in this pathologic subtype of breast cancer.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier Science-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL BREAST CANCER-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHBiomarkers, Tumor/metabolism-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Papillary/mortality*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Papillary/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Papillary/therapy-
dc.subject.MESHCase-Control Studies-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Grading-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSurvival Rate-
dc.titleDifferences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06)-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Pathology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Il Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDoo Ho Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Jae Huh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Yoon Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyubo Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEui Kyu Chie-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung W. Ha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Ae Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Ja Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Shin Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung Hwan Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoungmee Kwon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYong Bae Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang-Ok Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJa Seung Koo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBae Gwon Jeong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorIn Ah Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Hoon Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWon Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clbc.2015.01.008-
dc.contributor.localIdA00198-
dc.contributor.localIdA00744-
dc.contributor.localIdA01919-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00562-
dc.identifier.eissn1938-0666-
dc.identifier.pmid25776197-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820915000269-
dc.subject.keywordBreast cancer-
dc.subject.keywordCase–control study-
dc.subject.keywordInvasive micropapillary carcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordLocoregional recurrence-
dc.subject.keywordPattern of failure-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoo, Ja Seung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSuh, Chang Ok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKoo, Ja Seung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yong Bae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSuh, Chang Ok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor구자승-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage353-
dc.citation.endPage361-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL BREAST CANCER, Vol.15(5) : 353-361, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid39919-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.