0 604

Cited 25 times in

Minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for gastric cancer in the elderly: comparison with open surgery for patients 80 years and older

Authors
 In Gyu Kwon  ;  In Cho  ;  Ali Guner  ;  Hyoung-il Kim  ;  Sung Hoon Noh  ;  Woo Jin Hyung 
Citation
 SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.29(8) : 2321-2330, 2015 
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Health Services for the Aged ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotics ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery* ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Minimally invasive surgery ; Gastric cancer ; Elderly ; Gastrectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Octogenarian
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As life expectancy is increasing, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the elderly is gaining interest. The aim of this study was to identify the impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy by comparing the procedure to open surgery in octogenarians. In addition, we also evaluated the role of gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients by assessing long-term outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 99 gastric cancer patients aged 80 years or older, who underwent gastrectomy by either MIS or open surgery from 2005 to 2010. Patient characteristics, operative outcomes, pathologic results, morbidity, mortality, and follow-up data (including survival) were compared.
RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent gastrectomy with MIS (19 laparoscopic and 11 robotic) and 69 patients underwent open gastrectomy. MIS demonstrated significantly less blood loss, lower analgesic consumption, faster time to first flatus and soft diet, and a shorter post-operative hospital stay. Multivariate analysis revealed that the type of operation had no effect on the occurrence of complications. There were two postoperative mortalities, both in the open group. Excluding these patients, the overall and disease-specific 5-year survival rates were 57.4 and 70.0 %, respectively. The overall (MIS 70.0 %; open 52.0 %) and disease-specific (MIS 81.8 %; open 65.1 %) 5-year survival rates were similar for the two groups. When we analyzed the 85 patients underwent curative resection only, the overall (MIS 71.4 %; open 58.4 %) and disease-specific (MIS 84.1 %; open 73.6 %) 5-year survival rates were similar for the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: MIS for gastric cancer may be performed safely and maintains the advantages of minimal invasiveness, even in extremely old patients. Furthermore, gastrectomy by either by MIS or open surgery can reduce gastric cancer-related deaths, even in patients 80 years or older.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00464-014-3955-2
DOI
10.1007/s00464-014-3955-2
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kwon, In Gyu(권인규) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-467X
Kim, Hyoung Il(김형일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Noh, Sung Hoon(노성훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4386-6886
Cho, In(조인)
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/140852
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links