RAS Mutations in AUS/FLUS Cytology: Does it Have an Additional Role in BRAFV600E Mutation-Negative Nodules?

Abstract

The object of this study is to evaluate the additional role of RAS mutation in detecting thyroid malignancy among BRAF mutation-negative nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) on cytology.From December 2009 to December 2011, 202 BRAF mutation-negative thyroid nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS cytology in 201 patients were included in this study. RAS mutation analysis was performed using residual material from ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) cytology testing for K-RAS, N-RAS, and H-RAS codons 12/13 and 61 point mutations. The authors evaluated the association between RAS mutation status and cytopathologic characteristics.Of the 202 BRAF mutation-negative thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology, 4 were considered insufficient for mutation analysis. Of the 198 thyroid nodules, 148 (74.7%) were confirmed as benign and 50 (25.3%) as malignant. Thirty-one (15.7%) of the 198 thyroid nodules were positive for any RAS mutation, 4 positive for K-RAS 12/13, 26 for N-RAS 61, and 1 positive for H-RAS 61. Seven (22.6%) of the RAS mutation positive nodules were malignant, 1 with K-RAS 12/13, 6 with N-RAS 61. Twenty-four (77.4%) of the 31 nodules positive for K-RAS 12/13 (N = 3), N-RAS 61 (N = 20), or H-RAS 61 (N = 1) mutations were proven benign. None of the 198 thyroid nodules were positive for K-RAS 61, N-RAS 12/13, or H-RAS 12/13 mutations.N-RAS 61 mutation is the most common mutation detected among BRAF mutation-negative nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology. RAS mutation has limited value in predicting malignancy among BRAF mutation-negative thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology and further, investigation is anticipated to evaluate the true role of RAS mutation in thyroid malignancy.