0 649

Cited 31 times in

Artificial Neural Network Approach for Differentiating Open-Angle Glaucoma From Glaucoma Suspect Without a Visual Field Test

Authors
 Ein Oh  ;  Tae Keun Yoo  ;  Samin Hong 
Citation
 INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, Vol.56(6) : 3957-3966, 2015 
Journal Title
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
ISSN
 0146-0404 
Issue Date
2015
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological*/standards ; Female ; Glaucoma/classification ; Glaucoma/diagnosis* ; Glaucoma/physiopathology ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nerve Fibers/pathology ; Neural Networks (Computer)* ; Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Refractive Errors/physiopathology ; Retinal Ganglion Cells/pathology ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods ; Visual Acuity/physiology
Keywords
artificial neural network ; glaucoma suspect ; machine learning ; open-angle glaucoma ; risk prediction ; visual field test
Abstract
PURPOSE: To increase the effectiveness of treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG), we tried to find a screening method of differentiating OAG from glaucoma suspect (GS) without a visual field (VF) test.

METHODS: Data were collected from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted in 2010. Of 8958 participants, 386 suspected OAG subjects underwent a VF test. For the training dataset, five OAG risk prediction models were created using multivariate logistic regression and an artificial neural network (ANN) with various clinical variables. Informative variables were selected by an algorithm of consistency subset evaluation, and cross validation was used to optimize performance. The test dataset was used subsequently to assess OAG-prediction performance using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic.

RESULTS: Among five OAG risk prediction models, an ANN model with nine noncategorized factors had the greatest AUC (0.890). It predicted OAG with an accuracy of 84.0%, sensitivity of 78.3%, and specificity of 85.9%. It included four nonophthalmologic factors (sex, age, menopause, and duration of hypertension) and five ophthalmologic factors (IOP, spherical equivalent refractive errors, vertical cup-to-disc ratio, presence of superotemporal retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] defect, and presence of inferotemporal RNFL defect).

CONCLUSIONS: Though VF tests are considered the most important examination to distinguish OAG from GS, they sometimes are impractical to conduct for small private eye clinics and during large scale medical check-ups. The ANN approach may be a cost-effective screening tool for differentiating OAG patients from GS subjects.
Full Text
http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2343098
DOI
10.1167/iovs.15-16805
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Hong, Sa Min(홍사민)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/140498
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links