1 635

Cited 0 times in

SENSE factors for reliable cortical thickness measurement

Authors
 Hae-Jeong Park  ;  Tak Youn  ;  Seok-Oh Jeong  ;  Maeng-Keun Oh  ;  Sei-Young Kim  ;  Eung-Yeop Kim 
Citation
 NEUROIMAGE, Vol.40(1) : 187-196, 2008 
Journal Title
NEUROIMAGE
ISSN
 1053-8119 
Issue Date
2008
MeSH
Adult ; Algorithms* ; Analysis of Variance ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex/anatomy & histology* ; Cerebral Cortex/physiology* ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results
Keywords
Adult ; Algorithms* ; Analysis of Variance ; Brain Mapping ; Cerebral Cortex/anatomy & histology* ; Cerebral Cortex/physiology* ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to examine the effect of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) factors on cortical thickness measurements and to determine which SENSE factor to use to reliably measure cortical thickness in 3.0 T and 1.5 T T1-weighted MRI images. The 3D T1-TFE images were acquired from 11 healthy volunteers with 6 different SENSE acceleration factors from 1.0 (without SENSE acceleration) to 4.0 on a 1.5 T scanner, and 9 different SENSE factors from 1.0 to 6.0, plus a second-day 1.0 acquisition on a 3.0 T scanner. Cortical thickness was calculated for the entire cortical surface that was further subdivided into 33 regions. Repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed that the main effect of SENSE factors (F=12.485, df=7, p=0.006) was a significant underestimation of cortical thickness at SENSE 5.0 (p=0.022) and 6.0 (p=0.011) at 3.0 T and at SENSE 4.0 (p<0.000) at 1.5 T. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that thickness measurements at the insula, superior temporal sulcus, the medial part of the superior frontal lobe, and cingulate cortex are highly affected by SENSE factors. SENSE factors affect thickness estimation more significantly at 1.5 T and thus 1.5 T imaging provides less reliable estimates using SENSE techniques. Faster imaging can be done without too much loss of reliability using a high SENSE factor, such as 3.0, at 3.0 T with acquisition time being inversely proportional to the SENSE factor.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105381190701052X
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.013
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Nuclear Medicine (핵의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Eung Yeop(김응엽)
Park, Hae Jeong(박해정) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4633-0756
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/106428
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links