257 687

Cited 8 times in

Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity

Authors
 Sung-Jae Kim  ;  Ji-Hoon Chang  ;  Kyung-Soo Oh 
Citation
 CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, Vol.467(1) : 260-266, 2009 
Journal Title
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
ISSN
 0009-921X 
Issue Date
2009
MeSH
Adult ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging ; Joint Instability/epidemiology* ; Knee Injuries/diagnostic imaging ; Knee Injuries/epidemiology ; Knee Injuries/surgery ; Male ; Posterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging ; Posterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries* ; Posterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery* ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Young Adult
Keywords
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ; Posterior Cruciate Ligament ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury ; Tibial Tunnel ; Joint Laxity
Abstract
Generalized joint laxity has been considered a risk factor causing late failure of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments, although it is unknown whether that is the case for reconstructed posterior cruciate ligaments. We hypothesized patients with generalized joint laxity, compared with those without laxity, would have similar postoperative knee stability, range of motion, and functional scores after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The Beighton and Horan criteria were used to determine generalized joint laxity. We enrolled 24 patients with generalized joint laxity (Group L) and 29 patients without any positive findings of joint laxity (Group N) matched by gender and age. The average side-by-side differences of posterior tibial translation were 4.72 mm in Group L and 3.63 mm in Group N. We observed no differences in posterior tibial translation with differing graft materials or combined procedures. In Group L the International Knee Documentation Committee score was normal in 12.5% and nearly normal in 45.8% whereas in Group N, 24.1% were normal and 55.2% nearly normal. Patients with generalized joint laxity showed more posterior laxity than patients without joint laxity. Generalized joint laxity therefore appears to be a risk factor associated with posterior laxity after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
Files in This Item:
T200900035.pdf Download
DOI
10.1007/s11999-008-0554-3
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Sung Jae(김성재)
Oh, Kyung Soo(오경수)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/103388
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links